Satish Chand Garg v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT denied registration of an application removed to the tribunal after finding defects were unreconciled and the applicant appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Application declined to be registered.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 1000/2026
(Arising out of SA 799 of 2019 LUCKNOW DRT)
Date:22/05/2026
Satish Chand Garg ….. Appellant
Punjab National Bank …Respondents
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Shri Abhishek Kapariya holding brief of Shri Harsh Chopra is present.
The present Application was listed today i.e., 22.05.2026, for removal of defect as last opportunity. However defects have not been reconciled. It appears that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the present Application.
In view of the above, the Application is declined to be registered.
AY Registrar
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satish Chand Garg
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090010002026
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court