Safreena v. versus Federal Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal in AIR (SA) 280/2025 was rejected due to waiver for lack of representation (non-prosecution) since no withdrawal memo was filed by the appellant. The matter was disposed of by dismissing the waiver application and rejecting the appeal, with parties bearing their own costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 12th Day of February, 2026
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 509 of 2025 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 280 of 2025
(Arising out of IA 4770/2024 IN SA 2/2024 on the file of DRT-I, AT Ernakulam)
Between
Safreena V., W/o Muhammed Akbar V., Vemmulli House, Edayattur, Near Vemmulli Juma Masjid, Melattur, Malappuram, Pin 679 326. ..…Appellant
And
The Federal Bank Ltd., Rep. by Authorised Officer, Federal Towers, Mavoor Road, Arayidathupala, Kozhikode, Pin. 673 016. …..Respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Safreena V.
- respondent
The Federal Bank Ltd.
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090002802025
- Bench
- G. Chandrasekharan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court