A Rajaraman v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed an extension of time application and a waiver application due to non-compliance of conditions, leading to the rejection of the pending appeal.
What did the court decide?
The applications for extension of time (IA No.588/2026) and waiver (IA No.183/2026) are dismissed. The appeal in AIR (SA) 196/2026 is rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 27th Day of April, 2026
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 588/2026 (Extension) & IA 183/2026 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 196 of 2026
(Arising out of IA 2988/2025 in S.A.No.870/2025 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
A. Rajaraman, M/s. Carmiya Industries Private Limited, No.1 Arumugam Nagar, 2nd Street, Chinna Porur, Porur, Chennai 600 116.
… Appellant
And
M/s. Indian Bank, No. Naga Arcade, Willams Road, Contenmet, Tichy 620 001. …Respondent Counsel for Appellant : M/s. B. Murugan Counsel for Respondent : M/s. T. Sundar Rajan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Rajaraman, M/s. Carmiya Industries Private Limited
- respondent
M/s. Indian Bank
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 331090001962026
- Bench
- G. Chandrasekharan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court