Ms Ampel Rep by P Mazhar v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, sitting in Chennai, dismissed an application for waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal held that failure by appellants to make the 40% pre-deposit resulted in dismissal of the underlying appeal.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver of pre-deposit dismissed; underlying Appeal rejected; parties to bear own costs.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 13th day of July 2026
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 1625/2025 (Waiver) in AIR (SA) 1356/2025 (Arising out of M.A.Dy.No.49/2025 in S.A.No.675/2022 on the file of DRT-II, Chennai)
Between
- M/s. AMPEL, Represented by its Partner Mr. P. Mazhar, No. 1, Periyanna Maistry Street, Periamet, Chennai – 600 003. 2. P. Mazhar, Son of R. Athaullah Sahib, No. 1, Periyanna Maistry Street, Periamet, Chennai – 600 003. … Appellants
And
- The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda, Personal Stressed Asset Recovery Branch, Chennai Metro Region, First Floor, No. 10, C.P. Ramasamy Street, Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. 2. M/s. Hanisha Enterprises, Represented by its Proprietor Mr. D. Karthick, No. 24, Vinagayar Koil Street, Second Cross, Vaniyambadi – 635 751, Vellore District. …Respondents
1
Counsel for Appellants : M/s. S. Senthilnathan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal can be maintained when the appellant fails to make the statutory pre-deposit ordered by the Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. AMPEL
- appellant
P. Mazhar
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, Bank of Baroda
- respondent
M/s. Hanisha Enterprises
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090013562025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court