Mohamed Salim Iduddin Mansuri v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRTA dismissed a miscellaneous appeal as withdrawn after the respondents bank served a fresh Section 13(2) notice and offered no objection. All pending interim applications were also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The Miscellaneous Appeal No. 213/2026 and all pending I.As. were dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson I.A. No. 183/2026 (WoD)
In
Misc. Appeal Diary No. 213/2026
Between
Mohamed Salim Iduddin Mansuri & Anr.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Punjab National Bank & Ors.
…Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 20/07/2026: -
Present:
Mr. Shivam S., i/b M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Appellants.
Ms. Savita Nangare along with Anurag Satam, i/b M/s. Law Focus, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the filing of a fresh demand notice renders the SARFAESI appeal infructuous and justifies withdrawal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohamed Salim Iduddin Mansuri & Anr.
- respondent
Punjab National Bank & Ors.
Coram
Vivek Bharti Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 271090002132026
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court