The Delhi High Court dismissed M.A. No. 57/2025 for default due to non-appearance and lack of representation by the appellants.
M.A. No. 57/2025 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson M.A. No. 57/2025 (Refund of Deposit)
In
(Misc. Appeal on Diary No. 2066/2023-Dismissed)
Between
M/s. Gogila Textiles & Ors. … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorized Officer,
…Respondent/s
Indiabulls Commercial Credit Co. Ltd. Ms. Somya, i/b M/s. T.N. Tripathi & Co., Advocate for Respondent, appeared through a Video Conference.
-: Order dated: 16/04/2026: -
There is no representation for the Appellants despite repeated
calls.
It appears that the Appellants are not keen on prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the M.A. No. 57/2025 stands dismissed for default. All pending I.As., if any, stand dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-21
1
M/s. Gogila Textiles & Ors.
The Authorized Officer,
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
