Malti Devi v. Debts Recovery Tribunal
Case brief
What is this about?
Application in DI 994/2026 listed in DPP was withdrawn because the charge was shifted to another DRT.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL - ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 994/2026
(Arising out of SA 99 of 2026 LUCKNOW DRT)
Date:11/05/2026
Malti Devi ….. Appellant
--Vs—
Debts Recovery Tribunal ……... Respondents
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant Shri Shadab Alam is present.
Ld. Counsel for the Applicant submits that since the charge of DRT Lucknow has been entrusted to another DRT therefore the present application has become infructuous accordingly the Application is not pressed and is withdrawn.
In view of the above application is not required to be registered.
AY Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Malti Devi
- respondent
Debts Recovery Tribunal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090009942026
- Bench
- LD Registrar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court