R M Karuppaiah v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed IA 1615/2025 for non-compliance with a conditional order regarding the production of a High Court judgment. Consequently, the main Appeal AIR (SA) 1904/2024 was rejected and pending IAs were closed.
What did the court decide?
IA 1615/2025 dismissed; Appeal AIR (SA) 1904/2024 rejected; Pending IAs closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 10th Day of April, 2026
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 1615/2024 (modification) In AIR (SA) 1904 of 2024
(Arising out of MA (NDN) No. 2090/2024 in T.A.No.241/2023 on the file of DRT-II,
Chennai)
Between
- R.M. Karuppaiah,
- S/o Rama Thevar
- Mrs. K.R. Alagu, W/o R.M.Karuppaiah 1 & 2 residing at
961/3 Pannerpallam,
N. Pudur via Nachandupatti Post, Thirumayam Taluk, Pudukottai District 622 404.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether IA 1615/2025 is liable to be dismissed due to non-compliance with the conditional order?
Whether Appeal No. AIR (SA) 1904/2024 can proceed effectively without the High Court order?
Whether the pending second appeals should be closed?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
R.M. Karuppaiah and others
- respondent
State Bank of India, Rep. by its Branch Manager, Tirumayam Branch
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · G. Chandrasekharan
- Order 2 — this page · G. Chandrasekharan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court