Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the regular appeal for default due to the appellant's lack of representation and desire to prosecute the matter. Pending interim applications were also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Justice Vivek Bharti Sharma, Chairperson
I.A. No. 34/2023 (Cod) In
Regular Appeal Diary No. 323/2022
Between
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s.
Siddharth Suresh Bagul & Ors.
…Respondent/s
-: Order dated: 20/08/2026: -
No representation for both sides despite repeated calls.
It appears that the Appellant is not keen on prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Regular Appeal Diary No. 323/2022 is dismissed for default.
All pending I.As., if any, stand dismissed.
Sd/Chairperson
Psa-11
1
Encore Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
Siddharth Suresh Bagul & Ors.
Vivek Bharti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
