Tabassum v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal rejected an appeal and dismissed a waiver application due to non-compliance with prior conditional orders, closing all pending incidental applications.
What did the court decide?
IA 788/2024 dismissed; Appeal rejected; pending IAs closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 25th of September, 2025
PRESENT : Hon’ble Mr. Justice G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
A.IR:1544/2024
( IA-351/2024 in MA 04/2024 in OA 1861/2018 on the file of DRT-II, Bengaluru)
Between
Mrs. Tabassum Ara W/o Mohammed Wasim Aged about 48 years R/at No.107, Tahir Mansion, 5th Main Vinayaka Layout, RMV 2nd Stage, Boopasandra, Bangalore – 560 094
…..Appellant
And
M/s Canara Bank, SME Branch, No. 37 and 38 Venkatadri Complex, Behind Police Station, KHB Colony, Hoskote – 563114 Rep. by its Manager Smt. S. Vanishree
Respondent
Counsel for Appellant: Mr. M. A. Rajendra Counsel Respondent : Mr. M. L. Ganesh
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Tabassum Ara W/o Mohammed Wasim
- respondent
M/s Canara Bank
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090015442024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court