Sugumar K son of Karuppasamy v. Karur Vysya Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecuation of waiver application. The appellant failed to submit despite opportunities, resulting in rejection of the underlying appeal.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 21st Day of February, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 503/2022 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 248/2022 (Arising out of IA No. 2225/2022 in SA 564/2022 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
Sugumar K. S/o Karuppasamy Sole – Proprietor M/s. EssanTex No. 3/18, Kallipatti Street, Karavalimathapur, Sulur, Coimbatore – 641 668.
…Appellant
And
M/s. Karur Vysya Bank, Rep. by Authorised Officer, Asset Recovery Branch, 1498-C, KVB Towers, 3rd Floor, Avinashi Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore - 641 004.
…..Respondent Bank
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sugumar K. S/o Karuppasamy Sole – Proprietor M/s. EssanTex
- respondent
M/s. Karur Vysya Bank
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 331090002482022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
23 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court