K Sudharshan and another v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against DRT-II order dismissed as not maintainable due to failure by appellants to make the mandatory pre-deposit mandated by the composite order dated 24th January, 2025.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Diary No. 65 of 2024 (Arising out of S.A. 96 of 2019 in DRT-II, Hyderabad)
Order No. 23 25.02.2025
K. Sudharshan & Another
… Appellants
-Vs-
State Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondents
Mr. Nemani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellants
Ms. Mekhala Kanji, Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1/ Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Compliance of order dated 24th January, 2025 regarding pre-deposit is not made. Thus, the appeal is not maintainable for want of pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Sudharshan & Another
- respondent
State Bank of India & 2 Others
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · February
- CNR
- 191090000652024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court