Smt Rutuparna Dhirsamant v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-bench order allows a miscellaneous application to recall an order dismissing an appeal in default. The Chairperson found the appellant's personal reason for non-appearance sufficient to quash the default order and restored the appeal, listing it for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Recalled order dated 16.05.2025 dispping appeal in default and restored the appeal to its original number for hearing.
What the court decided
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appl. Dy No. 615 of 2025
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 32 14.07.2025
Smt. Rutuparna Dhirsamatn
... Appellant
--Vs--
Branch Manager, UCO Bank & Anr. .... Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Prasenjit Pal, ld. adv. Mr. Ajit Kr. Keshri, ld. adv. For Respondent : Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Misc. Application Dy. No. 615 of 2025 is filed for recalling of the order 16.05.2025 passed by this Tribunal whereby Appeal No.69 of 2023 was dismissed in default.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a miscellaneous application for default dismissal should be allowed when the appellant's absence was excused due to personal reasons?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Rutuparna Dhirsamatn
- respondent
Branch Manager, UCO Bank & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rich Engineers and Developers through Rohan Pinayak Mohanty versus Punjab National Bank
Rich Engineers and Developers through Rohan Pinayak Mohanty versus Punjab National Bank
Yanamandra Vijaya Lakshmi versus Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank
Punjab National Bank versus Sri Korrakuti Venkata Saketh Kumar