H S Savitri v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed an application for waiver of pre-deposit. The Tribunal rejected the underlying appeal due to the appellant's failure to deposit the required 25% pre-deposit by the stipulated deadline despite prior direction.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver of pre-deposit dismissed; underlying appeal rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 30th Day of January, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 330/2024 (Waiver) In
AIR(SA) 549/2024
(Arising out of IA 1479/2023 in SA 322/2023 on the file of DRT - I, Bangalore)
Between
H.S. Savitri W/o K.J. Puttaraju R/at No.8, Near New K HB ColonyCitizen English School Nanjangud, Mysore Karnataka – 571 301
…Appellant
And
- Chief Manager
Chief Manager Bevukal P.O Union Bank of India Mandya ECB Branch Office Karnataka – 571 405. 1751, Kalyani, Vidyanagara represented by his natural K.R. Road, Mandya guardian and mother Karnataka – 571 401. (2nd defendant)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether theAppeal should be allowed in the absence of compliance with the directional order of statutory pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
H.S. Savitri
- respondent
Bevukal Union Bank of India ECB Branch Mandya
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court