Appeal against Piramal capital & Housing Finance Ltd. was faced with defects. Appellant failed to comply with objections despite opportunity. Appeal was declined for registration under DRAT Rules.
The Appeal (Diary) No. 212112024 is hereby declined for Registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
n
Debts,RecqvgryAppellate Tri,Qun?|. Mu,mbai
APPeal(DiarY) No. 212112024
SatapathyDurga Prasad """Appellants
-Vs-
Piramal capital& Housing Finance Ltd. & ors.
... ... Respondents
Appeal (Diary)No.212112024 is tistedon today's board (09.06.2025)before the Ld. Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects.The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and alsoon the NoticeBoardof DRAT Mumbai'
None appearedfor the Appellantwhen matter is called out.
This Appeal(Diary) No. 21 2112024 was filed on 04.10.2024and certain objections wereraiseOby the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects' However, despitesufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date.
Therefore, itis presumedthat, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
ln view of theabove& under the provisions of sub Rule (a) of Rule 6 of DRAT (procedure) Rules,1994 the Appeal (Diary) No. 212112024 is hereby declined for Registration.
h^L
Date: 09.06.2025
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal should be allowed for registration when the appellant fails to comply with objections regarding defects despite sufficient opportunity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satapathy Durga Prasad
Piramal capital & Housing Finance Ltd. & ors.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
