M/S Rishi Woolen Mills and Others v. State Bank of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected a delayed restoration application filed by the appellant due to uncondoned two-year delay, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Application for condonation of delay and restoration application rejected; appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
Misc. Application No. 21/2023 In Appeal Dy. No. 33/2020 Date: 13.05.2025
M/s Rishi Woolen Mills & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.
Present: Shri R. P. Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri P. K. Gupta, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsels for the parties on the delay condonation application.
It appears that there is delay of two years in filing the present restoration application. In the restoration application, there is no good ground made out by the appellant for condoning the delay, thus the application for condonation of delay is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the same is rejected, consequently the restoration application also.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of two years in filing the restoration application warrants condonation for want of sufficient cause.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Rishi Woolen Mills & Ors.
- respondent
State Bank of India & Ors.
Coram
R. P. Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 091090000332020
- Topic
- Arbitration
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court