DRT-Appeals Bench dismissed appeal RA(SA) 65/2024 arising from a debt recovery proceeding due to non-prosecution and failure to file proof of newspaper publication for notice to one respondent (R4). No hearing was held as no representation was filed. Ex parte respondents did not appear.
Appeal RA(SA) 65/2024 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 23rd Day of June, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
RA(SA) 65/2024
(Arising out of TSA No.76/2023 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
..…Appellants
And
1
R2 and R3 residing at:
No.18, Shivaji Street,
T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017.
T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.
….Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Mr. Srinivassan J. Counsel for 1st Respondent Bank : M/s N. Kishore Kumar & Co.
R2, R3 & R5 remained ex parte.
ORDER
No representation for appellants. Ld. Counsel for first respondent bank is present. R2, R3 and R5 are already set ex parte .
It is seen that proof of paper publication is not filed in respect of R4.
Therefore, this Appeal RA(SA) 65/2024 is dismissed, for non prosecution.
Sd/-
[Justice G. Chandrasekharan] CHAIRPERSON
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be decided despite non-filing of proof of newspaper publication for notice to R4.
Mr. TNU. Tirupathi
Mr. TNU. Yuvarajan
Mrs. S. Indra
The Authorised officer, State Bank of India
Mrs. N. Vijaya
Mr. N. Srinivasan
G. Chandrasekharan
CHAIrSPERSON
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
