Dismissed
M/s Sakshi Grover v. Central Bank of India and Ors.
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/381/2019
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THT DEBTS RECOVERYAPPELLATI TRIBUhIAL AT KCLKATA (Holding Adclltional Charge of Debts RecCIveryAppellate Tribunal, Delhi) {sittingat DRAT, Delhi)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANILKUMAR SRIVASTAVA,CHAIRPIRSON
Appeal No.38112fr19
Arising out of SA No.31 1/?0 12 &'OA No,301 l?A12(DRT-Ill,Delhi)
HON'BLT MR- JU$TICE ANII- KUMARSRIVASTAVA,CHAIRPERSON
Ms Sakshi Grover" D/c Shri Yash Pai Grover,H No.23, Ranrpuri, Kaikaji,New Delht- 110019
.... Appellant
Versus
Central Barrk of lndia, Branch* VikasI',lirrar, New Dlehi-110002
a\ L. Shl Anuj Saini, Aclvocate Charnber No.K-83, Tis HazartDelhi. Delhi-54
Smt, Anjana Pcrwal, Vd/o Arun Kr:rnarFonvai,C/o Shop No.7, C'2, Suitanpuri, f-)crllrr
... ResPondents
Cour-rsel fcr Appellant
Cr:unsel for Responderrts
Ncne
Mr, [/tranish Kumar, Ld. Counselfor respondent no.1(through virtual mode),
Order
16th $eptember, 2015
IH EIIppELLAIE TFtHur{AL*
The matter is taken up in the revised list.Noneis presentfor appellant. Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 ispresent. However, the appellanthas movedl.A. No. B54nA19 for wavier ofpre-depo$it andl.A. No. 85512A19under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay.Both the applications are dismissed in default. Consequently, the appeal is alsodismissedas not maintainable as time barred
File be consigned to record room
, l-rI - *----**s-J--"1 **1 \c/ -':'t>e {AniiKut-nar Srivastava, J} C hairpe rso il
!1.:r-n-.ts.\I1r\YAmFEr_.t)..\
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N/AReferred
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms Sakshi Grover
Central Bank of India
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court