The appeal was dismissed for default as the appellant's counsel could not provide instructions, and no steps were taken to substitute the first respondent.
Appeal dismissed for default; interlocutory applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No.13/2021
Between
Essel Corporation Resources Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s
V/s.
Yes Bank Ltd. & Anr. …Respondent/s Mr Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellant.
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that he has no instructions. No steps have been taken to substitute the first respondent.
Hence, it appears that the appellant is not keen on proceeding with the appeal.
The appeal stands dismissed for default.
Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
mks-18
Sd/Chairperson
1
Essel Corporation Resources Pvt. Ltd.
Yes Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
