Pabitra Pran Saikia v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal condoned a two-day delay in filing an appeal and recalled a previous order dated 13th January 2025. The application was allowed, restoring the appeal to its original file, with hearing listed for 11th April 2025.
What did the court decide?
I.A. 88 of 2025 allowed condoning delay; Diary No. 170 of 2025 allowed and order of 13.01.2025 recalled.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Application Diary No. 170 of 2025
(In Appeal No. 46 of 2022)
Order No. 21 18.02.2025 Pabitra Pran Saikia … Appellant -VsUnion Bank of India
… Respondent
Ms. Sonal Shah with Mr. Kushagra Shah, Learned Counsel for the Appellant
Mr. Ranajit Chowdhury with Ms. Sampoorna Saha, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
I.A. 88 of 2025
Application, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of two days delay in filing the appeal along with an application for recall of the order dated 13th January, 2025.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Whether the order dated 13th January 2025 should be recalled.
Whether the appeal be restored to its original file and number.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pabitra Pran Saikia
- respondent
Union Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court