Nitin Bhagirath Chandak v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the direction to make the first pre-deposit instalment by the appellant.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed and interlocutory applications, if any, were also dismissed.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal on Diary No. 2230/2024
Between
Nitin S/o Bhogirath Chandak … Appellant/s
V/s.
The Authorised Officer,
…Respondent/s
Bank of Baroda
Ms. Leena S., Advocate for Appellant appeared through a Video Conference.
Mr. Neelanshu Roy, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 23/01/2025:-
The appellant has not complied with the direction of this Tribunal to make the 1st instalment of the pre-deposit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nitin S/o Bhogirath Chandak
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 271090022302024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court