Nandakumar T v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed an application for extension of time to comply with a conditional deposit order. Non-compliance led to the rejection of the appeal and enforcement of the order.
What did the court decide?
Extension of time for compliance denied; appeal dismissed; conditional order enforced.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 3rd Day of July, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 498/2025 (Waiver) In
AIR(SA) 1962/2024
(Arising out of SA 158/2020 on the file of DRT-II, Ernakulam)
Between
Nandakumar T. S/o Thankappan Pillai, Residing in ‘Dwaraka”, Nedumpana P.O., Kannanalloor, Kollam 691 580.
..…Appellant
And
- Authorised Officer & Chief Manager, State Bank of India, RASMEC, Kottarakkara, Lotus Tower, Pulamon, Kottarakkara, Kollam 691 531.
- State Bank of India, Odanavattom Branch, Rep. by its Branch Manager, D.K. Building, Pallimukku, Odanavattom P.O., Veliyam Panchayat, Kollam 691 512.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether extension of time should be granted for compliance with a conditional order despite non-compliance.
What is the consequence of non-compliance with a conditional deposit order on the maintenance of an appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nandakumar T. S/o Thankappan Pillai
- respondent
Authorised Officer & Chief Manager, State Bank of India, RASMEC, Kottarakkara
- respondent
State Bank of India, Odanavattom Branch
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090019622024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court