Ms Nisha Vitthalrao Munde v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar of the DRAT Mumbai, relying on insufficient compliance with procedural defects despite opportunity, presumed disinterest and declined registration of the miscellaneous appeal filed against a Debt Recovery Tribunal order.
What did the court decide?
The miscellaneous appeal (Misc. Appeal No. 26951/2024) is hereby declined for registration.
What the court decided
Debts RecoveryAppettate Tribunal. Mumhai
Misc. APPealD' No' 269512024
NishaVithalraoMunde
... . .. .APPellant
-Vs-
PunjabNational Bank
ResPondents
Misc.AppealD.No.26gsl2o24islistedontoday,sboard(07.11.2025\before the Ld.Registrarat 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects' The said BoardisdisplayedinPublicNoticeonthewebsiteofDRT/DRATandalsoon the NoticeBoard of DRAT Mumbai'
Noneappeared for the Appellantwhen matter is calledout'
ThisMisc.AppealD.No.26g5t2o24wasfiledon17.l2.2024andcertain objectionswereraisedbytheRegistryforcompliance/removalofdefects. However,despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defectstill date'
Therefore,it is presumed that,the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nisha Vithalrao Munde
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 271090026952024
- Bench
- Prabhupada Panda
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court