Ms Horizon Flora India Lmt v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal listed a Misc. Appeal unattended by the appellant, who failed to cure filing defects. Holding the matter unattended and lacking interest, the Tribunal declined to register the appeal citing Rule 6 of the Procedure Rules.
What did the court decide?
The Misc. Appeal D. No. 25612021 is declined for registration.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
J,\o
Debtq Recoyery Appellatp Tr,ibuQal. -Mumbai
Misc. Appeal D. No. 25612021
M/s Horizon Flora lndia Ltd. & Ors.
.., ... .Appellant
-Vs-
Bank Of Baroda & Anr.
Respondents
Misc. Appeal D. No. 25612021 islisted on today's board (05.08.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects.The said Board is displayed in PublicNotice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for the Appellant whenmatter is called out.
This Misc. Appeal D. No. 25612021was filed on 19.05.2021 and certain objections were raised by theRegistryfor compliance/removalof defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity,appellant failed to comply withlremove the defects till date.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Misc. Appeal should be registered despite the appellant failing to comply with objections to defects.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Horizon Flora lndia Ltd. & Ors.
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda & Anr.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 271090002562021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sri. P.w.gorakh
- Order 2 — this page · Prabhupada Panda
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court