Mr Shrinivas C v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal dismissed an application for waiver, holding that the appellant failed to comply with a statutory deposit condition, resulting in rejection of the underlying appeal.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver of deposit dismissed; underlying appeal rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 20th day of March, 2025
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 618/2024 (Waiver) in AIR (SA) 1212/2024 (Arising out of IA 1102/2024 in S.A.389/2024 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
Mr. Shrinivas C, S/o. Chandrasekaran, No. 7/44, Muthalamman Koil Street, Sadras, Kalpakkam – 603 102.
… Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank Of India, Velechery Branch, 15, Elephant Square, 15th Street, Tansi Nagar, Velachery, Chennai – 600 042.
…Respondent
Counsel for Appellant : Mrs. Gajalakshmi Karan Counsel for Respondent : Mr. S. Parthasarathy
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. Shrinivas C
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Union Bank Of India
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 331090012122024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court