Mr G Parthiban and Mr Subathra v. Axis Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act was rejected due to non-prosecution; delay condonation petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Condonation of delay petition dismissed for non-prosecution; appeal rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 7th day of August, 2025
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
AIR (SA) 990/2024 (Arising out of SA No.584/2023 on the file of DRT-III, Chennai)
Between
1. Mr. G. Parthiban S/o Mr. Ganesan
2. Mrs. Subathra W/o Mr. G. Parthiban
Both residing at Flat No. 5-A Ganapathy Nagar, 1st Street, Iyyencheri, Urapakkam, Chennai 603 210. …..Appellants
And
The Authorised Officer, Axis Bank Ltd., Retails Asset Centre, 4th Floor, Arcot Road, New No. 38, Old No.165, Arcot Road, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. …..Respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. G. Parthiban & Mrs. Subathra
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Axis Bank Ltd.
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · G. Chandrasekharan
- Order 2 — this page · G. Chandrasekharan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court