Mr D Babu v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellant was absent despite posting. The Income Tax Assessing Officer (respondent bank representative) was present. The Appeal Tribunal dismissed the waiver application and rejected the main appeal due to non-prosecution by the Appellant.
What did the court decide?
WAIVER IA 211/2023 is dismissed for default; Appeal AIR (SA) 237/2023 is rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 16th Day of January, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 211/2023 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 237/2023
(Arising out of SA 113/2021 on the file of DRT - III, Chennai)
Between
Mr. D. Babu,
S/o. Vellaikan Dhanapal, 5/516, Kalyanasundarar Street, Vivekanda Nagar, Kakkalur Village, Thiruvallur – 631 208. …Appellant
And
- The Authorised Officer,
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. D. Babu
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, Punjab National Bank
- respondent
M/s. Pablo Earth Movers and Excavators
- respondent
Mr. P. David
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090002372023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court