Mr Ayush Atul Baheti v. Encore Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Registrar dismissed the regular appeal because the appellant failed to comply with objections to remove defects.
What did the court decide?
Regular Appeal No. 2025/2024 is declined for registration.
What the court decided
n
A
Tribunal
Regular Appeal D. No.202512024
Aayush Atul Baheti
... .,..Appellant
-Vs-
A.O. Encore ReconstructionCo. (P) Ltd. & Ors.
Respondents
Regular Appeal D. No.2025t2024 is listed on today's board (22.A7.2025) before the Ld. Registrar at11.30 AM for compliance/removalof defects. The said Board is displayedin Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board ofDRAT Mumbai.
None appeared for theAppellantwhen matter is called out.
This Regutar AppealD.'No.202512024was filed on 21.09.2024and certain objections were raisedby the Registryfor compliance/removalof defects. However, despite sufficientopportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date'
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the regular appeal should be registered when the appellant failed to remove defects within the given time.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aayush Atul Baheti
- respondent
A.O. Encore Reconstruction Co. (P) Ltd. & Ors.
Coram
Registrar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court