Application filed seeking a direction for the District Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad, to decide pending Second Appeal No. 95/2021 expeditiously, preferably within three months, in accordance with the law.
Order directed the Presiding Officer, DRT, Allahabad, to decide S.A. No. 95/2021 preferably within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Application No. 04/2025 Date: 20.01.2025
Jagannath Saini Vs. Bank of Baroda
Present: Shri Shivaji Maurya, counsel for the applicant, Shri Avinash Jaiswal, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has filed the present misc. application for direction to the Tribunal below to decide the S.A. No. 95/2021 within the time as stipulated by this Tribunal.
In view of the above, the present application stands disposed off with direction upon the Presiding Officer, DRT, Allahabad to consider and decide the S.A. No. 95/2021, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law most expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal below is directed to decide the second appeal within a stipulated time limit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagannath Saini
Bank of Baroda
R. D. Khare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
