Disposed

ms shastri agarbatties private limitade through its director mr kirti himmatbhai chandrana v. Tatacapital Limitade

DRAT5 Jun 2025MISC APPEAL/71/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The debt recovery tribunal disposed of the appeal filed against an interim order. It directed the lower court to dispose of the main special appearance expeditiously within two months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Learned Presiding Officer, DRT, Nagpur, to dispose of the main special appearance within two months.

ms shastri agarbatties private limitade through its director… — Banking and Recovery | DRAT (2025)

¶1

Dated: 05.0'6.2025:
Heard the Learned Counsel for the parties in the Appeal.
i
.Conditional, or.der passed hy this Tribunal' oh dl'.05:2p25
in 1A 254/2025 (WoD) has been complied %wth.-
Registiy, DRAT, Mumbai, is directed: to number the
Appeal; if it is otherwise in order..
• In the.light .of submission-made-above and that* this Appeal
is filecbonly against an interiimorder, and.ndthing survives in this-
-Appeal, this Tribunal disposes of this Appeal giving' direction tp:
the; Learned -Presiding Officer} DRTi Nagpur, to. dispose, of-the.
main S.A. 321/2023, on merits and in accordance law, as
expeditiously as possible.
It- is; the .submission o:f Learned Counsel for Respondent
Bank that the . pleadings in S.A. No, 321/2024, before-DRT,
Nagpur; .are complete. This Appeal, is filed only against an
.'intenM order passed by ■Learned. Presiding Officer,DRTj Nagpur.
Thus„heprayed that this Appeal, be disposed of'giving a direction
to th© Learned ^Presiding Officer, DRT, tfagpur,. to dispose of the
inam S.Ai>Noi :321/2p24-a0 expbditipusly^as possible.
Interim order shall continue ifon the period, of two month;
■Learned Presiding Officer,, DRT, Nagpur, is directed that ah
endeavour-bemade to dispose of the;maih S.A;, within-a peridd'df
two month, and if that is.not possible, it is.lcft open 'to Learned.
; Presiding. Officer;, to decide LHc continuance of stay order subject
: t^^^huies of the matter.
DEBT RECOVERY. APPEtLAtE^TRiBUNAL-MUMBAl
(SITTING AT -CHENNAI)
Misc. Appeal _Dy _No.- 604/-2025

¶2

All the questions that have been raised before this Tribunal are left open to the parties to agitate before Learned Presiding Officer. Accordingly, this Appeal is disposed of. No order as to cost. All pending IAs, if any, stand closed. Chairperson, drat, che^naj (IN-CHARGE,,DRAT, MUMBAI) PSA

ms shastri agarbatties private limitade through its director mr kirti himmatbhai chandrana v. Tatacapital Limitade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

ms shastri agarbatties private limitade through its director mr kirti himmatbhai chandrana v. Tatacapital Limitade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chem Impex Usha Private Limited and Others versus Sammaan Capital Limited and Anr.

Pradeep Gordhandas Vora versus Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited

Mrs Kiran Vijay Joshi versus Piramal Capital and Housing Limited

Devendra Corporation versus Unity Small Finance Bank Limited

Mr Nilesh Radhakishan Gandhi and Others versus Jijau Commercial Co. Operative Bank Ltd.

Ms Shirbhate Builders and Developers Through Its Prop Shri Rajesh Babasaheb Shirbhate versus Jijau Commercial Co. Operative Bank Ltd.