Maddineni Suresh son of Rama Rao v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal in default at the admission stage as the appellant failed to appear on the scheduled dates. Pending applications and interim orders were disposed of accordingly.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Appeal Dy. No. 799 of 2025
(Arising out of SA No. 55 of 2019 in DRT-Visakhapatnam)
Order No. 05 11.08.2025
Maddineni Suresh & Ors ……Appellant -VsA.O. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
… Respondents
None for the Appellant
None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission I.A. No. 461 of 2025 I.A. No. 462 of 2025
The matter is taken up in the revised list. None is present for the Appellant. Even on 8th August, 2025 when the matter was taken up for admission no one appeared for the Appellant. Since today again none is appearing for the Appellant, it appears that the Appellant is not willing to press the Appeal. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed in default at admission stage.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Maddineni Suresh & Ors
- respondent
Bank of Baroda & Ors
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090007992025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Anil Kumar Srivastava
- Order 2 — this page · Anil Kumar Srivastava
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court