This appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel stated there was no instruction in the matter. No substantive legal propositions or decisions were rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 827/2023 Date: 19.05.2025
Liyakat Ali Kapadiya & 10 Ors. Vs. M/s India Infoline Finance Limited & 2 Ors.
Present: Shri V. K. Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Shri Akshat Agrawal, counsel for the appellants, Shri Ashish Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2,
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has no instruction in the matter.
In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Liyakat Ali Kapadiya & 10 Ors.
M/s India Infoline Finance Limited & 2 Ors.
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
