Jindal Restaurants v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this appeal, the appellant sought to withdraw the present appeal. The court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The withdrawal application was allowed; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 1493/2023 Date: 06.05.2025
Jindal Restaurants Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Anr.
Present: Shri Umang Chopra, counsel for the appellant through V.C., Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Shadab Alam, counsel for the respondent-Borrower,
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the copy of withdrawal application has not been served upon him. Learned counsel for the appellant is directed to serve the copy of withdrawal application upon the counsel for the respondent-Bank within 48 hours.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he wants to withdraw the present appeal, therefore, the withdrawal application may be allowed and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above, the withdrawal application is allowed. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jindal Restaurants
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court