Debt Recovery Tribunal addressed a pre-dated application for contempt against a respondent who allegedly removed machinery from auctioned property. The Tribunal issued notice to a third-party purchaser and listed the matter for further orders.
Notice issued to Respondent No. 3; case listed for proof of service and hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TR1BUNAL-MUMBAI (SITTING At-CHENNAI} LA. No. 60/2021 (Stay) In Regulm- Appeal No. 7/2021 . Dated: 23.06.2025. The matter is-taken up for hearing by way of a Praedpc filed by tiie Petitioners/Appellarits for seeking urgent relief. Advocates Mr B. Guruinurthy and Mr D. Thanigaivcl undertake to file Vakalat for Respondent No. 2. No representation for Respondent No. 3. Learned Counsel for Petitioners/Appcllants press for hearing on LA. Dy. No. 1298/2023, the application filed to take steps against Respondent No. 2 for committing contempt of this, court’s order passed in LA. No. 60/2021 On 27.01.2023. It is the submission of Learned Counsel • for Petitioners/Appellants that by the said' order, the Auction Purchaser was directed not to create any third-party interest or do anything in the property diminishing its value till the hearing of the Appeal No. 7/2021. Violating this order. Respondent No.2 has removed the, machineries from, the property*. Therefore, he seeks action for committing contempt of 'this court’s order'. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 .Bank submitted that reply is already filed. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 sccks timc to reply. It is the case that after sale of the property ^y Respondent v- No,2, Respondent No.'2 in turn sold the said property in favour of Respondent No. 3 namely Mrs. Deepa Jitcn Jcsing.
Learned Counsel for Petitioncrs/Appeliants is directed to Cake notice to Respondent No.3 through post. List the case on 24.07.2025, for filing proof of setvice for Respondent No3 and for hearing. Registry is directed to return the papers submitted by Learned Counsel for Petitioners/Appellants for him to re-present. the same in a bound volume with index. Vakalat and reply by Respondent No.2 by then. CHA1RPB»So:,i,wM. c,>€«xl fK<Jt”Oe. MUiT. MUiTAl) MKS
Petitioners/Appellants
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Mrs. Deepa Jitcn Jesing
unknown
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
