The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai (in-charge Mumbai), allowed an application for condonation of a 14-day delay in filing a regular appeal, accepting the appellant's explanation of obtaining instructions.
Delay of 14 days in filing the Appeal is condoned; Registry directed to number the Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAi (SITTING: AT -CHENNAI) . I.A, No. 241/2025 (GoD). In Regular Appeal Dy .No'. 452/2024 .Dated: 06.05.2025 When the- matter is taken, up, it is informed by' .Learned Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant that notice taken to Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has been served through post and. e-mail. Notice taken to .Respondent,Nd. ,3 also has been .served through ’ post as well as e-niail. Sroof of Service is filed ’before the. Registry., DRAT, MUmbai; There is no representation for any of 'the; i Respondents) .Heard Learned Counsel for . Petitioner/Appellant. This Application is filed for condonation of delay of 14 days in filing the Appeal. Learned Counsel for Petitioner'/Appellant ^submits that there; was. delay of 2. days, in filing: the Appeal, and that too, occurred due to in getting ihstrhctions for filing this Appeal. She further' submitted that the delay is neither wilful nor
f
wanton. The Petitioner/Appellant has got good case to contest on merits and seeks to condone the delay.
In the said circumstances stated by the Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner/Appeliant and having satisfied with the reasons assigned by the Petitioner/Appeliant for condoning the delay, and. with the view to provide an Opportunity to the Petitioner/Appeliant to proceed with the main appeal and dispose of the same on merits, the delay of 14 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. The Registry, DRAT, Mumbai, is directed tp number the Appeal, if it is otherwise, in order. CHAIRPERSON, DRAT. CHENNAI (IN-CHARGE, DRAT> MUMBAI) PSA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 14 days in filing the regular appeal should be condoned?
Petitioner/Appellant
Respondents 1 and 2
Respondent No. 3
CHAIRPERSON, DRAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
