The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as in fructuous due to the appellant losing physical possession of the property subsequent to the order date, declaring all pending inquiries closed.
All pending inquiries closed; Petitioner/Appellant to pay enhanced filing fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
? DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNALMUMBAI (srTTrNG.AT _CHENNAT)
I.A. No. tgs/2025 {woD) In
, Misc" zX.ppeal Dy No. 860/2A2|
Dated: Zt,,A+.Z}ZS
'When the matter is taker: rF, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/Appellants sqbmittgcl that subsequent to order passed bry this Tribunal on'2A.A3.2A25,. the physical possession of the property had been taken on ZO.O}.2A2S, alrd therefore, nothing survive.s in this .Appeal. Thus, prays for disposal of this Appeal.
In the said circumstalces stated, *ris Appeal is dismissed as in.fructuous. All pending IAs, if any, star:d ciosed.
Learned Presiding Officer, DRT-li, Ahmedabad, is directed to dispose of Securitisation Applicatioir No. 116 of 2025, on merits and in accordance with larv, as expeditiously as possible, in vierz", of the proposed sale scheduled.
tWqnt cHAr RPERsoN, nnhY,'cilnNNar (IN-CHAIiGE, DRAT, IVIUMIIAII
h,lKS
Petitioners/Appellants
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
