Harihar Chourasia v. Punjab and Sind Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Harihar Chourasia appealed an order under the SARFAESI Act. The Court disposed of the appeal, directed the lower Tribunal to decide the pending securitization application expeditiously within three months, and maintained status quo on property possession.
What did the court decide?
Stay on possession of property and direction to lower Tribunal to decide securitization application within three months.
What the court decided
Appeal Dy. No. 934/2025 Date: 04.06.2025
Harihar Chourasia Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank
Present: Shri S. K. Gupta along with Shri Bablu, counsel for the appellant,
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that after issuance of demand notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, the appellant has deposited Rs. 5.26 lacs against the total outstanding amount of Rs. 11,71,624/-, details of which has been mentioned in para 5.4 of the memo of appeal. Learned counsel further contends that Rs. 5.00 lacs has been deposited before this Tribunal, thus, a total sum of Rs. 10.26 lacs has been deposited by the appellant. Learned counsel has drawn attention of this court to the page no. 43 of the paper book, which is copy of publication of sale notice. In the said notice, the total outstanding amount was shown to be Rs. 11.71 lacs, whereas the respondent-Bank in the affidavit filed before the District Magistrate has shown the outstanding amount to be Rs. 6,80,231/-. It is thus contended that the account was regularized after deposit of said amount, therefore, no proceeding could have been drawn by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act.
In the last, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the ADM (F&R) Lucknow has issued a notice dated 15.05.2025 to the appellant for handing over the physical possession of the property in question till 06.06.2025, otherwise the possession will be taken forcibly. It is, therefore, prayed that the Tribunal below may be directed to dispose off the S.A. filed by the appellant within the time as stipulated by this Tribunal and in the interregnum, the possession of the property in question may not be disturbed.
After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, since the securitization application is still pending before the Tribunal below, therefore, the present appeal stands disposed off finally with direction upon the Tribunal below to consider and decide the pending Securitization application in accordance with law most expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Till that time or disposal of the securitization application, whichever is earlier, the status quo qua the property in question as it exists today is directed to be maintained by all the parties concerned.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be disposed of while the securitization application remains pending before the Tribunal below.
Whether status quo regarding the possession of the property is to be maintained during the pendency of the securitization application.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Harihar Chourasia
- respondent
Punjab and Sind Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 091090009342025
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court