R Dhanalakshmi v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal set aside on withdrawal following out-of-court settlement. Tribunal recorder.
What did the court decide?
Appeal rejected consequentially to withdrawal of adhesive application
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 06th Day of January, 2025
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. Chandrasekharan CHAIRPERSON
IA 372/2023 (Waiver)
In
AIR (SA) 980/2023
(Arising out of IA 2069/2023 in SA 390/2023 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
Mrs.R.Dhanalakshmi, W/o. V.S.Ramasamy, Proprietor M/s. Pranav Traders, 5/536, Bharathiyar Nagar, N.Kosavampatti, Namakkal – 637 002 …Appellant
And
The Authorised Officer, M/s.Canara Bank Namakkal SME Branch No.75, 1 Floor, Varadaraj Arcade, Trichy Road, Namakkal – 637 001 …..Respondent
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. R. Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
The Authorised Officer, M/s. Canara Bank Namakkal SME Branch No. 75
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · January
- CNR
- 331090009802023
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court