This is a one-line order in an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The court declined to register the appeal because the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter and has no instructions despite prior opportunities to remove defects.
The appeal is declined to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL- ALLAHABAD
Diary No. 1425/2024
(Arising out of S.A. No. 542/2023 Lucknow DRT)
Date 20.05.2025
Aditya Birla Finance Limited ……………..Appellant
Vs.
Jai Durga Cosmetics and Gift Gallery …… Respondent
Ld. Counsel appellant Shri Shivaji Maurya holding brief of Shri K. Kartikeya is present and seeks further time for removal of defects.
This appeal was filed on 23.10.2024. Several opportunities have been granted to the appellant for removing the defects as pointed out by the registry in the past. Ld. Counsel appellant submits that he has no instruction for the appellant.
It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal therefore, the appeal is declined to register.
Registrar
Aditya Birla Finance Limited
Jai Durga Cosmetics and Gift Gallery
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
