Yes Bank v. Madhu Chanda Sirkar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal disposed of the appeal as not pressed by the appellant, directing the DRT to expedite the pending interim application.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Misc. Appl. Dy No. 934 of 2024
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No. 15
08.10.2024
Yes Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Appellants
Vs.
Madhu Chanda Sirkar & Anr.
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. P. K. Mukherjee, ld. adv Mr. Sayak Ranjan Ganguly, ld. adv. For Respondent : Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, ld. adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant will not press the appeal. Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yes Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- respondent
Madhu Chanda Sirkar & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 191090009342024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court