Ms Firoz Hosiery v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal dismissed an application for transferring a suit as the ground for transfer (absence of Presiding Officer) no longer existed, rendering the request infructuous.
The Tribunal dismissed an application for transferring a suit as the ground for transfer (absence of Presiding Officer) no longer existed, rendering the request infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Transfer Petition No. 18 of 2023
(Arising out of SA No. 314 of 2023 in DRT-2, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
13.02.2024
M/s Firoz Hoseiry & Anr ... Appellant -VsIndian Bank & ors ……Respondents
None for the Appellant None for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
The matter is taken up. None is present. This is an application for seeking transfer of S.A. No. 314 of 2023 from the file of DRT-2 Kolkata to any other DRT on the ground that no Presiding Officer is posted in DRT-2 Kolkata. Presiding Officer has joined in DRT-2 Kolkata. Accordingly, Application becomes infructuous and is dismissed.
Pending I.A.s if any, are disposed of accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of the order be supplied to the Appellant and the Respondent and the copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record Room.
2
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court today.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated 13th February, 2024
6/tp
c
M/s Firoz Hoseiry & Anr
Indian Bank & ors
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court