Tek Wizard v. Catholic Syrian Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai refused to grant further time to the appellants to prosecute their appeal due to lack of interest despite repeated adjournments. Consequently, the waiver application and the appeal were dismissed/rejected.
What did the court decide?
Request for further time refused. IA 216/2022 dismissed; Appeal AIR (SA) 126/2022 rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 12th Day of July, 2024
PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CHAIRPERSON
IA 216/2022 (Waiver) In AIR (SA) 126/2022
(IA 656/2022 in SA 193/2022 on the file of DRT, Madurai)
Between
- M/s Tek Wizard, Partnership firm, Represented by its Partner, Mrs. Jasmine Princess, No.2, G.S.T. Road, Alanthur, Chennai 600 016.
- Mrs. Jasmine Princess, W/o Mr. Paul Winston, Partner, M/s Tek Wizard
- Mr. Paul Winston Partner M/s Tek Wizard
Appellants 2 and 3 are at:
No.A-1, Sai Ayush Rameesha, No.2, Golden Avenue, SDK Nagar, Velacherry, Chennai 600 042.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the request for further time to prosecute the appeal can be granted given the lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s Tek Wizard, Partnership firm
- appellant
Mrs. Jasmine Princess
- appellant
Mr. Paul Winston
- respondent
CSB Bank Formerly Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court