Sri Sanjay Debnath v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed. The counsel for the appellant stated that the matter between the parties was settled. Pending interim applications were dismissed as infructuous, and interim order, if any, were vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; pending interim applications dismissed as infructuous; interim orders vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
Misc. Appeal Dy. No. 458 of 2024
(Arising out of S.A. No. 220 of 2022 in DRT-II, Kolkata)
Order No.05 13.08.2024
Sanjay Debnath & Ors ……..Appellant
-Vs-
Indian Bank & Anr.
……Respondents
Mss. Mitul Chakrabarty, Learned Counsel, Ms. Payel Nath, Learned Counsel for the Appellant. Ms. Debjani Ghosal, Learned Counsel for the Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Admission
Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that the Appellant does not want to press the present appeal since the matter is settled between the parties and the Learned Counsel endorses upon the Memo of Appeal to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sanjay Debnath & Ors
- respondent
Indian Bank & Anr
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · August
- CNR
- 191090004582024
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court