Two appeals before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai were allowed to be withdrawn. The court disposed of both Appeal No. 94/2017 and Appeal No. 95/2017 on withdrawal by the appellants, dismissing incidental applications.
The withdrawal of both appeals allowed; appeals disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Appeal No. 94/2017
Between
M/s Aditi Re-rolling Mills Pvt Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
State Bank of India
…Respondent/s
AND
Appeal No. 95/2017
Between
M/s Triumph Steel Udyog Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/s
V/s.
State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr Jamshed Ansari along with Ms Misbah Ansari, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Bhalchandra Kumbhar, i/b Mr Vivek Sawant, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
The Ld. Counsel for the appellant under instructions from the appellant seeks the withdrawal of the appeals.
The prayer is allowed.
Both appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.
Interlocutory applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Chairperson
mks-09 & 10
1
M/s Aditi Re-rolling Mills Pvt Ltd.
State Bank of India
M/s Triumph Steel Udyog Pvt. Ltd.
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
