Disposed
Prakash M Rajgor v. South Indian Bank
DRATREGULAR APPEAL/60/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Appeal declined for registration for failure to remove defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Appeal (D) No.381/2024
Prakash Rajgor & Ors
....Appellant
V/s.
The Authorised Officer, South Indian Bank
Respondent
Appeal (D) No.381/2024 is listed in today’s board (07.08.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
Adv Sachin Kaikini present for the Appellant when the matter was called out.
Appeal (D) No. 381/2024 was filed on 23.02.2023 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of above & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Appeal (D) No. 381/2024 is hereby declined for Registration.
07.08.2024
Regi^ti^r (1/C)
Prakash Rajgor & Ors
The Authorised Officer, South Indian Bank
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court