issued, but, no acknowledgment of receipt of the said notice by the respondents was produced before Tribunal below. However, respondents approached the appellant to get a copy of the said notice and sent a reply on 8.7.2021 and respondents also sent lots of E-mails for regularization of the account and for settlement, as per the demand made in demand notice dated 6.7.2021. Ld. Counsel further submitted that as per 13(2) notice the loan account fell into NPA on 31.4.2021 but loan account was active till December, 2021 as per appellant’s statement of accounts. It is further submitted that Possession Notice dated 12.10.2021 was challenged before Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition No.548/2022 and in the said Writ Petition conditional order was passed directing the respondents to make deposit of 30% of the possession notice amount in three instalments of 10% each and that was duly complied with by the respondents. Thereafter, in October, 2022, in the same Writ Petition, there was a direction to respondents to make deposit of 30% in three instalments and that was partly complied with and stay got vacated in 2024. Therefore, the contention of the appellant that appellant had no opportunity for filing their objections is incorrect and prayed this Tribunal to dismiss the appeal.
