Pandhari Sukhdev Marathe v. Avas Financiers Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT Mumbai declined to register Appeal (D) No.85/2024 under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Rules, 1994, as the appellant failed to comply with objections regarding defects within the permissible timeframe.
What did the court decide?
The Appeal (D) No.85/2024 is declined for registration under Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994.
What the court decided
f
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Appeal (D) No.85/2024
Pandhari Sukhdev Marathe & Anr
Appellant
V/s.
A V A S Financiers Ltd
Respondent
Appeal (D) No.85/2024 is listed in today’s Aboard (12.06.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed ip Public Notice on the website' of DRT/DRAT and also on the I Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai. ;
None present for the Appellant when the matter was called out/
Appeal (D) No.85/2024 was filed on 16.01.2024 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter. ;
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Pandhari Sukhdev Marathe & Anr
- respondent
A V A S Financiers Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · June
- CNR
- 271090000852024
- Bench
- Nishad Fazil F
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court