V Naveenkumar v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal, having directed a 25% pre-deposit which remained uncomplied with by the expiry of the stipulated time, dismissed the waiver application and the underlying appeal.
What did the court decide?
Application for waiver of pre-deposit dismissed; appeal rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 22nd day of November, 2024
PRESENT : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN
CHAIRPERSON
IA 226/2024 (Waiver) In
AIR (SA) 276/2024
(Arising out of I.A.283/2024 in S.A.No.680/2022 on the file of DRT, Coimbatore)
Between
Mr. V. Naveen Kumar, Partner M/s. Rich Look Fashions, No. 3/333, Thotta Salai, Ugayanur, Veerapandi Via, Tirupur – 641 605.
… Appellant
And
The Authorized Officer, M/s. State Bank of India, Stressed Assets Recovery Branch, No. 377/1, Dr. Nanjappa Road, Behind N.S. Palaniyappa Nursing Home, Coimbatore – 641 018.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mr. V. Naveen Kumar
- respondent
The Authorized Officer, M/s. State Bank of India
Coram
G. Chandrasekharan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court