This court declined to register an appeal filed by a Power of Attorney holder on behalf of the appellant after accepting the matter is settled, invoking DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994 Rule 6(4).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
s *
Appeal (D) No.785/2022
Mukundbhai Haribhai Kancharia (POA of Sureshbhai Haribhai Kancharia & Lalitaben Sureshbhai Kancharia)
Appellant
V/s.
Indian Bank
Respondent
Appeal (D) No.785/2022 is listed in today’s board (08.05.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also onUhe Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
Adv Mumtaz Khan Present for the Appellant when matter is called and filed pursis. for withdrawal of the Appeal as the matter is settled between the parties
Appeal (D) No.785/2022 was filed on 29.09.2022 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of Pursis filed for withdrawal & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Appeal (D) No.785/2022 is hereby declined for Registration.
08.05.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukundbhai Haribhai Kancharia
Indian Bank
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
