The Appellant failed to appear and complied with objections against defects in the filed Miscellaneous Appeal. Under Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, the appeal was declined for registration due to lack of interest.
Declined for Registration
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Misc.Appeal (D) No.2019/2023
Chetna Rajendra Kapoor
...Appellant
V/s.
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co Ltd
...Respondent
Misc.Appeal (D) No.2019/2023 is listed in today’s board (12.08.2024) before the Registrar at 02.30 PM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
None present for the Appellant when matter is called.
Misc.Appeal (D) No. 2019/2023 was filed on 10.11.2023 and certain objections were raised by the registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of above & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Misc. Appeal (D) No. 2019/2023 is hereby declined for Registration.
12.08.2024
Registrar (l/C)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to register a miscellaneous appeal when the appellant failed to comply with objections regarding defects in the filed petition after sufficient opportunity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chetna Rajendra Kapoor
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co Ltd
Registrar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
